Controversy Continues as The Danish Girl gets Release Date

Remember how, in the general scope of cinema, Benedict Cumberbatch was relatively unknown, and then suddenly HE WAS EVERYWHERE? It looks like a similar ascension is on the horizon for Eddie Redmayne. Fresh off his Oscar win for The Theory of Everything, and probably gaining a cult following for his over-the-top villain in Jupiter Ascending, the next role on Redmayne’s list is already generating buzz.

lili elbe

Last week on Twitter we were granted a glamorous glimpse at Eddie as Lili Elbe in The Danish Girl. Originally a book inspired by true events, the film is slated for a November 27th release date. But much of the buzz surrounding the film is the controversy of a cisgender male portraying a transgender woman.

Look, I love Eddie Redmayne and I have no doubt he’ll give another poignant performance. He’s prepared for the role of Lili by meeting women of the transgender community and just generally trying to educate himself. And that’s great that he wants to do both Lili and the community justice, but what about an actual trans actor?

“There is an incredibly valid discussion for why a trans actress isn’t playing the part, because there are so many brilliant trans actresses, and I’m sure there are many who could play this part sensationally.” – Eddie Redmayne in a Telegraph interview

This is a pleasant change from the excuse that Transparent gave with its casting of Jeffrey Tambor as a trans lead, but it still doesn’t address whether any trans people of the acting profession were ever considered. Apparently Tom Hooper, who also directed Redmayne in Les Miserables, sent him the script a few years back and he loved it. Another contender for the role of Lili was Nicole Kidman, a cisgender woman. Which I think goes against the “explanation” as to why a cisgender male was given the part. In the same Telegraph interview quoted above, Redmayne stated that the use of hormones (which were not largely available in the 1930s for Lili) complicate the casting. “Nowadays….many trans women have taken hormones. But to start this part playing male you’d have to come off [them].”

you're talking i hear meh meh
My feelings in a gif

That’s a fallacious argument. If you follow the logic that “So-and-so- can’t play Biologically Male if they’ve taken female hormones”, it becomes a slippery slope. A slope of “You can’t play that character fighting Depression because your serotonin level is normal!” or “How dare they put age makeup and prosthetics on that actor? We know how young they really are!” It’s an argument that demeans the effort of the actor and the ability of the film to suspend the audience’s disbelief.

I have no doubt Eddie Redmayne will give a great performance, and that the minds of the film are doing as much as they can to avoid exploitation of the transgender community. But I agree with Susan Stryker that it’s a missed opportunity to cast a trans actor as the first transgender woman to have a successful reassignment surgery, and it may end up contributing to more unfortunate stereotypes.

Is Eddie Redmayne right for the role of Lili Elbe?  Don’t be afraid to weigh in!

2 thoughts on “Controversy Continues as The Danish Girl gets Release Date

  1. These are all good points. From what I got from the trailer, the movie is about the life of Lily before and during transition, than after transition. In many series like OITNB and Sense8 I loved to see a transgender woman being portrayed as a transgender woman. But what about the movie Predestination? I find that one well casted because the cis-gender actress showed what she had to do to transition to male (the voice, the walk) – it was not that she felt transgender, she was intersex.

    I think Redmayne is excellent for the role and well casted. He is an excellent actor and very versatile, and puts many other actors to shame. If we are going to go through this road of “trans people should be portrayed by trans people”, then we should also say “gay people should be portrayed by gay people”, and “non-binary people should be portrayed by non-binary people”. It is nice to see x being portrayed by x, but it shouldn’t be a must and it shouldn’t be wrong.

    I get excited to see a big shot actor portray something that they are not and something that I am – like Benedict Cumberbatch as a gay man – as it forces people to get into their shoes, and in the end become an activist and an ally like Cumberbatch ended up being. Having big shot actors tell a story of a minority’s difficulties reaches more people, and if done well, people will not forget the emotion and how it must feel.

  2. There was an interview with Hooper, where he said that of course he considered a Trans woman portraying a Trans woman, but that the right person was not found

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s